From previous review, an annotated image showing XAML with annotations to views, layouts, behaviours, data binding, etc. Also, image is not available in cited source: looks like citation is wrong. "While, custom renderers" change to "Custom renderers" "user-interface": change to "user interface": used in more than one place Instead can say, "For details, refer to officially documented (link-here)." "apps are (link-here)": not a good way to link to other sites, particularly from SEO perspective. "Except iOS, Android": wrong use of Except word: instead can say "Apart from." Which IDEs have support for XF other than Visual Studio? "Visual Studio is the recommended IDE": important claim but no citation. first para: same citation is used: sufficient to include it end of the para "mobile apps (iOS or Android), UWP apps": grammar: change to "mobile apps (iOS or Android) and UWP apps" UWP: acronym should be expanded with a short description of UWP apps
Benefits: Add more details to this answer, including case studies from industry. answer should go into inner details of how XF works: this has some details: ģ. delete first two paras, third para is okay How it works: same comment as previous review
content is fine but writing style can be better.
0 kommentar(er)
